You must write your abstract last. As we wrote the findings into the bubbles we shifted the wording to find shorter ways of saying the same thing and started to blend some of the findings together.
Refer back to problem posed, and describe the conclusions that you reached from carrying out this investigation, summarize new observations, new interpretations, and new insights that have resulted from the present work.
Writing in Psychology course syllabus. The findings are really a series of observations which can be backed up with evidence. Are the data presented in context. Reading Because of the literature explosion, papers more skimmed than read.
Once you have written the results section, you can move on to the discussion section.
One of the most common mistakes that you can make when discussing the results of your study is to present a superficial interpretation of the findings that more or less re-states the results section of your paper.
You will get credit from later researchers for this. Got any tips on the discussion chapter. Avoid jumping a currently fashionable point of view unless your results really do strongly support them. Have you used any methods like the ones outlined here.
Otherwise, follow the general order you reported the findings in the results section. Think of your discussion as an inverted pyramid. Specifically, at short distances we observed both very large and very small correlations, while at longer distances we observed only smaller correlations Tables where more than pages.
They will evaluate the quality, amount and — most importantly — the believability of your knowledge claims. Therefore, you should construct your paper so that it can be understood by skimming, i.
Wendy sat in a chair and just talked at me.
With this in mind, be careful that you do not read more into the findings than can be supported by the evidence you have gathered. Our main finding consists of highly heterogeneous local populations with relatively large correlations between a minority of neighboring neurons.
Wendy still has one data collection round to run so some findings are more speculative than others. Many scientists read only the abstract, figures, figure captions, tables, table captions, and conclusions of a paper.
After you have finished the recommendation section, look back at your original introduction. These should be the first two pieces of information the reader encounters.
Another useful suggestion from Howard Becker is the null hypothesis technique; write down why the results mean nothing. Harper Collins Publishers, New York, pp.
Here is another approach. If more work is needed for a definitive answer, say that. Dissertation Discussion Help for the Best Results Ever Most students find dissertation discussion chapter the most challenging one for a number of reasons.
The common problem all. The purpose of the discussion is to interpret and describe the significance of your findings in light of what was already known about the research problem being investigated, and to explain any new understanding or insights about the problem after you've taken the findings into consideration.
Writing the Discussion. The discussion section is a framing section, like the Introduction, which returns to the significance argument set up in your introduction.
The discussion section of dissertation is probably the most complicated one. The reasons are that this part is the most discursive and interpretative. In it, you will evaluate the results of your study about the hypothesis and research questions as well as about the current research.
In many thesis the discussion is the most important section. Make sure that you allocate enough time and space for a good discussion. This is your opportunity to show that you have understood the significance of your findings and that you are capable of applying theory in an independent manner.
Discussion is one of the hardest section in research paper or thesis. It needs experience, learning and practice. It is not a way to restate your results.Problem discussion thesis